Male and female fat distribution and fat cell reactivity differs. Male-type centrally stored fat cells (around the abdomen) are known to be different in size and function to gluteal tissue, being more responsive to lipolytic and less responsive to lipogenic stimuli. Males generally use more energy for a set amount of exercise because of the larger proportion of lean body mass, or muscle, for a given body mass. Gluteal fat stores in females are widely regarded as having a biological function as an energy reserve for reproduction and milk production during lactation, and these are relatively resistant to fat loss even with high energy output or low energy intake.

Women experience greater hormonal swings throughout life (menarche, menstrual cycle, pregnancy and menopause) and these can impact significantly on body fat levels. The hormone levels in men by contrast, change only gradually with time as testosterone levels gradually decline with age. Women who don’t gain excessive weight during pregnancy, and who remain active both during pregnancy and after parturition, don’t seem to be at risk for extra fat gain—at least for the first 1-2 pregnancies. Women who are overfat or obese and who gain excessive weight during pregnancy are more likely to have problems after delivery. Breast-feeding mothers (over 6 months of breast-feeding) have been shown to stay leaner for longer than non-breast feeding mothers. In general also, the more babies a woman has, the greater her chances of becoming overfat or obese. It’s not known, however, whether this is due to physiological factors or the reduced ability to exercise and increased opportunity for over-eating, or whether it’s simply an association with other socioeconomic factors. Large families and obesity are more common in lower socioeconomic groups and the social status may be the determining factor for both.

Body composition differences between the genders also favour males in terms of energy expenditure. Men, in general, have a higher lean body mass to total mass ratio, with 12-24 per cent of body composition in the form of adipose tissue. Females on the other hand carry 15-30 per cent of their body mass in the form of fat. Higher lean body mass, even given constant weight, ensures a higher resting metabolic rate and hence men tend to have a greater energy use at rest. During exercise it has been shown that a man utilises up to 40 per cent more energy walking a set distance than a similar sized female.

Finally, there are psychological and sociological differences between the sexes which, although potentially changeable, can have a profound impact on body fat levels. The idealised female shape, for example, is now one of thinness. This has changed throughout history, there being good evidence (in art and literature) that a more ample female form has been preferred in the past. When fatness indicated wealth, a well-fed female body was desired. In the 20th century in Western countries, where energy-rich food is generally plentiful, fatness is easy and leanness is more associated with wealth, status and influence. Anorexia nervosa is the pathological extreme of this obsession with a thin figure.

Dietitian Jenny O’Dea from Sydney University has shown that females generally idealise a much thinner body size for themselves than is preferred by most males. The social pressures to conform to an ideal shape is greater in females (even if it is largely females who apply that pressure). A pot belly in a male doesn’t attract the same social pressures as a similar degree of fatness in a female, even though the male’s fatness is more dangerous to health.

Sex differences in body fatness have very real implications for fat loss planning. It is totally unrealistic to expect similar results from a male and female placed on the same type of fat loss program, although this is often expected by partners who may undertake the same kind of program. To the extreme frustration (and often guilt and depression) of the female partner, it is usually the male who is able to lose fat more easily and faster, and to keep this off longer, than the female. More support is often needed for females to ensure adequate eating patterns to encourage satisfaction with a body shape which is less than ideal and to prevent discouragement with slow fat losses.

*178\186\4*

Google Bookmarks Digg Reddit del.icio.us Ma.gnolia Technorati Slashdot Yahoo My Web

The energy content of foods, or the energy requirements of physical activities, can be measured in a number of ways. Basically there are three categories of measures that are used:

1. Direct calorimetry. Direct calorimetry can also be used to measure energy expenditure in the form of heat loss from the human body. This requires placing a person in a small chamber in which all the heat released is measured. Unfortunately, such chambers are very expensive and are only present in well-established research laboratories. Direct calorimetry can also be used to measure the energy content of food through ‘bomb calorimetry’, as previously discussed.

2. Indirect calorimetry. This calculates energy use directly from measurements of the amount of oxygen (O2) consumed, carbon dioxide (CO2) and nitrogen produced (the latter to eliminate protein metabolism in the equation). This can also be done in a chamber (metabolic or respiratory chamber) over periods of 24 hours or more, or it can be done with a hood system over a period of minutes or hours.

From indirect calorimetry equations, the amount of each type of energy substrate being used can also be calculated. This is expressed as the respiratory exchange ratio (RER), or respiratory quotient (RQ).

The RER, which is based on the ratio of oxygen (02) consumed to carbon dioxide (CO2) produced, can provide information about whether the predominant energy source being used is carbohydrate or fat. The theory behind this is that more oxygen is required to bum fat relative to the amount of carbon dioxide produced. In fact, the ratio of 02 to C02 is around 0.7 when fat is the total fuel being oxidised. On the other hand, when carbohydrate is used as a fuel, equal amounts of 02 and C02 are involved. Where carbohydrate is the sole fuel therefore the ratio of 02 to C02 is 1.0.

At rest, the terms respiratory exchange ratio (RER) and respiratory quotient (RQ) can be used interchangeably, although strictly speaking there is a difference. RER refers to the exchange ratio of gases expired, whereas RQ is a measure of the ratio of fuel use at the tissue level. RER, which is more relevant for our purposes here, is derived from the chemical calculations.

*39\186\4*

Google Bookmarks Digg Reddit del.icio.us Ma.gnolia Technorati Slashdot Yahoo My Web

Lesli Hicks used to think that a meal just wasn’t complete unless it ended with a sweet—until she faced going to her 10-year high school reunion 35 pounds heavier.

A steady diet of chocolate, cakes, cookies, and pastries transformed Lesli, of San Antonio, from trim to tubby. Once a slim 105 pounds in high school, she was pushing 140 pounds a decade later when the invitation to her class reunion arrived. “I wasn’t obese, but I definitely weighed a lot more than I should have,” she says. “I didn’t want my old classmates to see how much I had gained.”

Determination set in. Out went the peanut butter cups, doughnuts, and other confections that had become part of Lesli’s meal- time routine. “I knew that I couldn’t eat just a little dessert,” she says, “It was either all or nothing.” To satisfy her sweet tooth, she con- | j? eluded her meals with natural sweets—primarily apples, pears, and other fruits.

Lesli’s discipline paid off. Within a few weeks, she whittled 10 pounds from her-5-foot-2-inch frame. She went to her class reunion feeling fit and fantastic. “I looked better than ever—even better than when I was 105 pounds,” she says.

After the reunion, Lesli lost even more weight. Within a few weeks, she was down to 122 pounds, where she has stayed ever since. Now age 37, she’d like to take off several more pounds to reach 115 or 116. She sticks with her weight-loss regimen by allowing herself one dessert splurge a week. “When I’m tempted for more, I ask myself, Am I going to feel better or worse after I eat that?’” she says. “Usually, I tell myself that I’ll feel worse, and I pass up the food.”

WINNING ACTION

Indulge in dessert—but only when you really need it.

Cheesecake, hot-fudge sundaes, and other high-fat goodies have their place in a healthy diet, as long as they’re not everyday fare. At other times, you can satisfy your sweet tooth with low-fat treats. Besides fresh fruit, there’s angel food cake (0.1 gram of fat per serving), fig bars (1 gram), fortune cookies (0 gram), lady fingers (2 grams), and rice pudding (4 grams).

*31\89\8*

Google Bookmarks Digg Reddit del.icio.us Ma.gnolia Technorati Slashdot Yahoo My Web